HTA cost-effectiveness assessments

The progress being made in medicine and the discussion of scarce resources in the healthcare system make the need to question the efficacy of health benefits and the efficient use of resources more important than ever. When health products and technologies are assessed, the point is not simply to establish whether a new analysis, surgical technique or medicine is effective, but also how great the added value is compared to existing interventions.

The term Health Technology Assessment (HTA) has become established for this systematic evaluation of medical procedures and technologies. The objective of this benefit assessment must be to keep the health service open to innovations in order to improve the quality of care and treatment outcomes.

Not a tool for rationing

Major efforts are being undertaken worldwide to assess prevention, diagnosis, therapies, medicinal products, organisational structures and chains of care in order to provide the authorities with a basis for taking health-policy decisions that will be accepted by the population. Systems like HTA for assessing health benefits can provide important information on the relative efficiency of therapeutic alternatives and are thus an important decision-making aid.

The Federal Council’s Health 2030 strategy aims to improve medical treatment while monitoring cost developments. As part of its Health 2020 strategy, the federal government has already launched an HTA program to reevaluate services already covered by compulsory health insurance. In this context, HTA enables transparent and evidence-based decision-making in order to reduce ineffective and inefficient services, improve the quality of healthcare, and reduce costs.

HTA must meet demanding requirements

Expansion of cost-effectiveness assessments like HTA is a demanding task. They are cost-intensive and therefore require a clear focus. They should examine entire treatment pathways and organisational structures rather than individual interventions. Furthermore, an assessment of health benefits must be based on solid scientific methods and their use must be transparent, timely, balanced and fair. Activities without prior consultation can lead to duplication and unnecessary bureaucracy. It is therefore important to avoid overlap in order to make as efficient use as possible of scarce resources.